Lockin

Glossary → Precommitment

Precommitment: Binding Your Future Self Before Temptation Arrives

Precommitment is the act of restricting your own future options while you are still clear-headed, so that a worse version of yourself — one closer to the temptation — cannot reverse the decision.

Definition

Precommitment is a deliberate strategy in which a person, while in a rational and forward-looking state, places binding constraints on what their future self is permitted to do. The core logic is that human beings are time-inconsistent: the preferences you hold right now, with the temptation safely in the future, will predictably shift once that temptation is close at hand. Precommitment acknowledges this shift in advance and structures a constraint that makes the weaker preference irreversible or costly to act on. The mechanism works because it exploits the asymmetry between the present and future self. Today's you can enter contracts, accept penalties, remove access, or enlist third parties. Tomorrow's you — the one who actually faces the craving, the fatigue, the impulse — cannot easily undo what today's you has arranged. The future self is handed a situation rather than a choice. This is not a novel trick. Ulysses ordered his crew to tie him to the mast before sailing past the Sirens, because he correctly forecast that future-Ulysses would beg them to stop. He used his authority while clear-headed to remove his own authority when vulnerable. The structure appears throughout human institutions: retirement accounts with withdrawal penalties, marriage vows before witnesses, sobriety chips handed to a sponsor. Precommitment is most effective when three conditions hold. First, you must accurately predict your future weakness — vague good intentions are not enough. Second, the constraint must be credible, meaning the cost of breaking it must be high enough that future-you treats it as binding rather than advisory. Third, the commitment must be made before the temptation window opens; once the craving has started, present bias collapses the time horizon and rational precommitment becomes very difficult. The behavioral economics literature distinguishes soft precommitment (reducing friction, removing cues, arranging social accountability) from hard precommitment (financial stakes, legal contracts, irreversible actions). Hard precommitment is more reliable precisely because it leaves future-you with less room to rationalize an exit.

Where it comes from

The formal economic treatment of precommitment originates with Robert H. Strotz's 1955 paper in the Review of Economic Studies, which proved mathematically that a rational planner who anticipates their own future preference reversals will seek to constrain those reversals in advance. Schelling extended the concept in 1984. George Ainslie deepened the psychological account in 1992.

How Lockin uses this

When you open a Lockin contract, you are performing a textbook hard precommitment. You stake real money against a specific daily behavior before the temptation window opens. Tomorrow morning, when the alarm sounds or the app icon appears, the financial forfeit is already in place. Your future self does not get to renegotiate the terms. The stake functions as the mast and the rope simultaneously: it raises the cost of backing out to the point where future-you is more likely to follow through than to forfeit.

Citations

Related terms

Where this shows up in practice

Stop deciding. Start staking.

Free to download. You set the habit, the limit, the stake, and the charity.

Author

The Lockin Team — Lockin Editorial

Last verified